Taliban Not Equipped to Fix Afghanistan
Published in Stars & Stripes
To be clear,
I don’t want to sound like a pessimist. I welcome any step, no matter how
small, taken toward bringing peace to my native Afghanistan. The signing of the
peace agreement between the United States and the Taliban fed hope
that the deal would lead to another agreement between the Taliban and the Afghan
government. But the Taliban has refused to engage, calling the Afghan government a “servant
of foreigners.”
So any optimism at this point would
appear to be misplaced.The Taliban continues to attack Afghan security forces. The
New York Times
reportedthat during the month of May,at least 285 pro-government forces
were killed by such attacks, and 155 civilians have been killed in Afghanistan in
the last three weeks.The Taliban has only intensified their attacks.
Despite the spike
in violence, the Afghan government stands ready to hold talks with the Taliban,
according to a government spokesperson.
For the sake
of argument, let’s assume that a peace deal between the Afghan government and
the Taliban is reached, and the Taliban reestablishes its Islamic emirate. The
question remains: can the Taliban fix Afghanistan?
Afghanistan is
basically a failed state;most of its infrastructure and institutions have been
shattered, roads are pitted with holes, and buildings have broken windows. Its
government has proven unable to enforce the rule of law or control its borders.
It’s also unable to collect sufficient
revenues to pay its civil servants or provide essential services to its
citizens.
According to
a U.S.State Department report, Afghanistan has a poor, agrarian economy with a
small manufacturing base, few value-added industries, and a partially
dollarized economy. More than 55 percent of the population lives below the
poverty line.
International
financial and security support has been instrumental in growing the Afghan
economy from a $2.4 billion Gross Domestic Product in 2001 to a $20.1 billion
GDP(U.S. dollars) in 2018. Various estimates place the value of the “informal
economy”(mostly based on illicit activities)to be an additional $4.1 billion.
Although the
Government of National Unity has been able to increase tax revenue by
implementing reforms and improved tax collection procedures, government
expenses still far exceed revenues, resulting in continued dependency on
international donors for the foreseeable future.
Is resuscitation
possible?
Robert
Rotberg, past president of the World Peace Foundation, writes that a failed
state may be resuscitated by addressing three primary goals: jump-starting a
battered economy, reintroducing the rule of law,and rejuvenating civil society .But
this is a colossal task that would require willing participation from the
Taliban, who are mostly from rural areas with little or no formal education.
Retired U.S.
Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, who commanded U.S. troops in Afghanistan for
three years, doesn’t believe it will ever happen.
“As I’ve said publicly, the Taliban are untrustworthy,” Allen wrote for the Brookings Institute. “Their doctrine is irreconcilable with modernity and the rights of women; and in practice, they’re incapable of summoning the necessary internal controls and organizational discipline needed to implement a far-flung agreement like this. The so-called‘Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan’ will not only not be honored by the Taliban, it will also not bring peace.”
After
serving many years in Afghanistan as a translator for NATO forces, I tend to
concur. So far, the Taliban haven’t made a case for any economic or
political plans, except to state their goal of reestablishing an Islamic emirate.
The only way
they could truly
help fix Afghanistan would be to become part of the political process and abandon
thegoal of imposing the strict rule of Islam.
But sadly,
the chances of
that happening appear to be zero.
Comments
Post a Comment